Skip to main content
Split comparison of timer-based tracking versus calendar-based export approaches to timesheets
Productivity

Fill the Timesheet vs. Toggl: Which Is Right for You?

Both tools help with timesheets, but they solve different problems. Toggl tracks time in real-time. Fill the Timesheet exports it retroactively. Here's when to use each.

March 30, 20265 min read

Two Different Approaches to the Same Problem

Toggl Track and Fill the Timesheet both help you create timesheets. But they approach the problem from opposite directions:

  • Toggl Track is a timer-first tool. You start a timer when you begin a task, stop it when you're done, and Toggl records the entry. At the end of the week, your time log is your timesheet.
  • Fill the Timesheet is an export-first tool. You don't track anything new — you connect calendars and project tools you already use, and it pulls the data into a formatted timesheet.
Neither approach is universally better. The right choice depends on how you work.

Feature Comparison

FeatureToggl TrackFill the Timesheet
ApproachStart/stop timerPull from existing tools
Data sourceManual entry + timerGoogle Calendar, Teams, Zoom, Jira, ClickUp, Asana, Monday.com, Toggl
Real-time trackingYes (core feature)No (retroactive export)
Multiple sourcesToggl only8 sources in one export
Excel exportCSV (raw)Formatted .xlsx with templates
Template formatsPDF reports6 templates (standard, billing, grid, etc.)
Data storageToggl servers100% in your browser
Team managementYes (Team plan)No (individual export)
InvoicingNo (but integrates with tools)No
Free tier5 users, unlimited tracking1 source, 7-day exports
Paid pricing$9/user/month$5/month (flat)
Mobile appYes (iOS, Android)No (web-based)

When Toggl Is the Better Choice

1. You need real-time tracking. If your workflow requires knowing exactly how long a task takes as you do it — for personal productivity, for estimating future projects, or for strict per-task billing — Toggl's timer is the right tool.

2. You work on tasks that aren't in any calendar. Deep coding sessions, design work, writing — these often don't appear on your calendar. Toggl captures them.

3. You need team management. Toggl's Team and Business plans include manager dashboards, project budgets, and team-level reporting. Fill the Timesheet is designed for individual export, not team oversight.

4. You want a mobile app. Toggl has solid iOS and Android apps. Fill the Timesheet is web-only.

When Fill the Timesheet Is the Better Choice

1. Your work is already tracked elsewhere. If your meetings are in Google Calendar, your tasks are in Jira, and your calls are in Zoom — the data exists. You don't need to track it again with a timer. Just export it.

2. You need formatted Excel output. Toggl exports raw CSV. Fill the Timesheet exports formatted .xlsx with 6 template options — standard, detailed, daily summary, client billing, simple log, and grid.

3. You use multiple tools. A developer might have meetings in Google Calendar, sprint work in Jira, and ad-hoc tasks in ClickUp. Fill the Timesheet combines all three into one export. With Toggl, you'd need to enter everything into Toggl manually or use one data source.

4. Data privacy matters. Fill the Timesheet processes everything in your browser. Your calendar data is never sent to any server. Toggl stores your data on their servers (with standard security practices).

5. You hate timers. Some people find timers disruptive. Constantly starting and stopping a timer breaks flow. If you'd rather just export at the end of the week, Fill the Timesheet's approach is less intrusive.

Using Both Together

Here's the thing: they're not mutually exclusive.

Many users track focused, non-meeting work in Toggl (coding sessions, design work, writing) and let their calendar handle meetings and scheduled work. Then they connect both to Fill the Timesheet:

This gives you the precision of timer-based tracking for deep work AND the automatic capture of calendar events — without double-entry.

Pricing Comparison

PlanToggl TrackFill the Timesheet
Free5 users, basic features1 source, 7-day exports
Starter$9/user/month
Pro$5/month (flat, all sources)
Premium$18/user/month
Key difference: Toggl charges per user. Fill the Timesheet charges a flat rate. For a team of 5, Toggl Starter costs $45/month vs. $5/month for Fill the Timesheet Pro. But Toggl includes team management features that Fill the Timesheet doesn't offer.

The Bottom Line

Choose Toggl if you need real-time timers, team management, or mobile tracking.

Choose Fill the Timesheet if your work is already in calendars/project tools and you want formatted Excel exports without additional tracking overhead.

Use both if you want the best of both worlds — timer precision for deep work, automatic capture for everything else.